Obamas Neocon: The Curious Case of Richard Holbrooke
By Joshua Frank
CounterPunch, Jan 27, 2009
In wee morning hours on Friday, January 23, a U.S. spy plane killed at least 15 in Pakistan near the Afghanistan border. It was Barack Obamas first blood and the U.S.s first violation of Pakistans sovereignty under the new administration. The attack was an early sign that the newly minted president may not be overhauling the War on Terror this week, or even next.
As the U.S. government fired upon alleged terrorists in the rugged outback of Pakistan, Obama was back in Washington appointing Richard Holbrooke as a special U.S. representative to Pakistan and Afghanistan. Unfortunately, like the remote control bombing that claimed human life, Obamas vision for the region, in the embodiment of Holbrooke, may not be a drastic departure from the failed Bush doctrine. Or a departure at all.
[Holbrooke] is one of the most talented diplomats of his generation, Obama said during a January 22 press conference at the State Department. In his speech Obama declared that both Afghanistan and Pakistan will be the central front in the War on Terror. There, as in the Middle East, we must understand that we cannot deal with our problems in isolation, he said.
Despite Obamas insistence that Holbrooke is qualified to leave the U.S.s new efforts in the War on Terror, history seems to disagree.
In 1975, during Gerald Fords administration, Indonesia invaded East Timor and slaughtered 200,000 indigenous Timorese. The Indonesian invasion of East Timor set the stage for a long and bloody occupation that recently ended after an international peacekeeping force was introduced in 1999.
Transcripts of meetings among Indonesian dictator Mohamed Suharto, Gerald Ford, and his Secretary of State Henry Kissinger have shown conclusively that Kissinger and Ford authorized and encouraged Suhatros murderous actions. We will understand and will not press you on the issue [of East Timor], said President Ford in a meeting with Suharto and Kissinger in early December 1975, days before Suhartos bloodbath. We understand the problem and the intentions you have, he added.
Henry Kissinger also stressed at the meeting that the use of US-made arms could create problems, but then added, It depends on how we construe it; whether it is in self-defense or is a foreign operation. Thus, Kissingers concern was not about whether US arms would be used offensively, but whether the act could be interpreted as illegal. Kissinger went on: It is important that whatever you do succeeds quickly.
After Gerald Fords loss and Jimmy Carters ascendance into the White House in 1976, Indonesia requested additional arms to continue its brutal occupation, even though there was a supposed ban on arms trades to Suhartos government. It was Carters appointee to the Department of States Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Richard Holbrooke, who authorized additional arms shipments to Indonesia during this supposed blockade. Many scholars have noted that this was the period when the Indonesian suppression of the Timorese reached genocidal levels.
During his testimony before Congress in February 1978, Professor Benedict Anderson cited a report that proved there was never an US arms ban, and that during the period of the alleged ban the US initiated new offers of military weaponry to the Indonesians:
If we are curious as to why the Indonesians never felt the force of the U.S. governments anguish, the answer is quite simple. In flat contradiction to express statements by General Fish, Mr. Oakley and Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Richard Holbrooke, at least four separate offers of military equipment were made to the Indonesian government during the JanuaryJune 1976 administrative suspension. This equipment consisted mainly of supplies and parts for OV-10 Broncos, Vietnam War era planes designed for counterinsurgency operations against adversaries without effective anti-aircraft weapons, and wholly useless for defending Indonesia from a foreign enemy. The policy of supplying the Indonesian regime with Broncos, as well as other counterinsurgency-related equipment has continued without substantial change from the Ford through the present Carter administrations.
If we track Holbrookes recent statements, the disturbing symbiosis between him and figures like überhawk Paul Wolfowitz is startling.
In an unguarded moment just before the 2000 election, Richard Holbrooke opened a foreign policy speech with a fawning tribute to his host, Paul Wolfowitz, who was then the dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, reported First of the Month following the terrorist attacks in 2001.
The article continued: Holbrooke, a senior adviser to Al Gore, was acutely aware that either he or Wolfowitz would be playing important roles in the next administration. Looking perhaps to assure the world of the continuity of US foreign policy, he told his audience that Wolfowitzs recent activities illustrate something thats very important about American foreign policy in an election year, and that is the degree to which there are still common themes between the parties. The example he chose to illustrate his point was East Timor, which was invaded and occupied in 1975 by Indonesia with US weapons a security policy backed and partly shaped by Holbrooke and Wolfowitz. Paul and I, he said, have been in frequent touch to make sure that we keep [East Timor] out of the presidential campaign, where it would do no good to American or Indonesian interests.
In sum, Holbrooke has worked vigorously to keep his bloody campaign silent. The results of which appear to have paid off. In chilling words, Holbrooke describes the motivations behind support of Indonesias genocidal actions:
The situation in East Timor is one of the number of very important concerns of the United States in Indonesia. Indonesia, with a population of 150 million people, is the fifth largest nation in the world, is a moderate member of the Non-Aligned Movement, is an important oil producer which plays a moderate role within OPEC and occupies a strategic position astride the sea lanes between the Pacific and Indian Oceans We highly value our cooperative relationship with Indonesia.
If his bloody history in East Timor is anything, its a sign that Richard Holbrooke is not qualified to lead the USs policies in a new direction in todays Middle East a region that has been brutalized by the illegitimate War on Terror.